| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Xavi X7968. This impacts an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2012-5323. The attack can be initiated remotely. Additionally, an exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Xavi X7968 (version now known). It has been rated as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webconfig/admin_passwd/passwd.html/admin_passwd in Xavi X7968 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the administrator password via the sysUserName, sysPassword, and sysCfmPwd parameters.
The weakness was released 10/08/2012 (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2012-5323 since 10/08/2012. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.
The exploit is available at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (73354), Exploit-DB (36864), SecurityFocus (BID 52098†) and Secunia (SA48050†). Entry connected to this vulnerability is available at VDB-62620. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
02/21/2012 🔍03/06/2012 🔍
10/08/2012 🔍
10/08/2012 🔍
10/08/2012 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
08/13/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2012-5323 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2012-5323
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-62621
X-Force: 73354
SecurityFocus: 52098 - Xavi 7968 ADSL Router Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 48050 - XAVi X7968 Cross-Site Scripting and Request Forgery Vulnerabilities, Less Critical
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 12:22Updated: 08/13/2024 22:56
Changes: 03/24/2015 12:22 (48), 03/16/2019 08:54 (6), 08/13/2024 22:56 (25)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.