| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in e107 CMS 1.0.2. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown function. This manipulation of the argument download_class causes cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2012-6434. The attack may be initiated remotely. In addition, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in e107 CMS 1.0.2 (Content Management System). It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code block. The manipulation of the argument download_class with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in e107_admin/download.php in e107 1.0.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct SQL injection attacks via the (1) download_url, (2) download_url_extended, (3) download_author_email, (4) download_author_website, (5) download_image, (6) download_thumb, (7) download_visible, or (8) download_class parameter.
The weakness was presented 01/03/2013 (Website). The advisory is shared at e107.svn.sourceforge.net. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2012-6434 since 12/26/2012. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details and also a public exploit are known.
It is possible to download the exploit at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Exploit-DB (23829) and OSVDB (88908†). See VDB-63312 for similar entry. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/26/2012 🔍01/03/2013 🔍
01/03/2013 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
06/13/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: e107.svn.sourceforge.netStatus: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2012-6434 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2012-6434
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-63313
OSVDB: 88908
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 12:22Updated: 06/13/2024 22:32
Changes: 03/24/2015 12:22 (50), 07/11/2019 08:47 (4), 06/13/2024 22:32 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.