Cisco Telepresence Video Communication Servers Software X7.0.3 access control

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Cisco Telepresence Video Communication Servers Software X7.0.3. It has been rated as critical. This affects an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in access control. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2012-5444. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Cisco Telepresence Video Communication Servers Software X7.0.3 (Unified Communication Software). It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a access control vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-264. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) X7.0.3 does not properly process certain search rules, which allows remote attackers to create conferences via an unspecified Conductor request, aka Bug ID CSCub67989.
The weakness was disclosed 01/17/2013 with Cisco as CSCub67989 as confirmed security notice (Website). The advisory is shared at tools.cisco.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2012-5444. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 12/21/2021). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (81391), SecurityFocus (BID 57486†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-53284†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.cisco.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Access controlCWE: CWE-264
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
10/17/2012 🔍01/12/2013 🔍
01/12/2013 🔍
01/17/2013 🔍
01/17/2013 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
10/07/2015 🔍
12/21/2021 🔍
Sources
Vendor: cisco.comAdvisory: CSCub67989
Organization: Cisco
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2012-5444 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2012-5444
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-63357
X-Force: 81391
SecurityFocus: 57486 - Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server Policy Services Security Bypass Vulnerability
Vulnerability Center: 53284 - Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) Remote Security Bypass via an Unspecified Conductor Request, Medium
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 12:22Updated: 12/21/2021 16:36
Changes: 03/24/2015 12:22 (49), 02/03/2018 10:51 (9), 12/21/2021 16:36 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:310:103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.