| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in DiY-CMS 1.0. It has been classified as problematic. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file mod.php. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2012-6518. The attack can be initiated remotely. Additionally, an exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in DiY-CMS 1.0 (Content Management System). It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown code block of the file mod.php. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in mod.php in DiY-CMS 1.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create a poll via an add action to the poll module.
The weakness was released 01/23/2013 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at archives.neohapsis.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2012-6518 since 01/23/2013. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details and a public exploit are known.
The exploit is shared for download at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. By approaching the search of inurl:mod.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (75230), Exploit-DB (18804), SecurityFocus (BID 53266†), OSVDB (81560†) and Secunia (SA49011†). Entries connected to this vulnerability are available at VDB-63412 and VDB-63410. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/26/2012 🔍04/27/2012 🔍
01/23/2013 🔍
01/23/2013 🔍
01/23/2013 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
01/01/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: archives.neohapsis.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2012-6518 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2012-6518
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-63411
X-Force: 75230
SecurityFocus: 53266 - DIY-CMS SQL Injection Vulnerability and Multiple HTML Injection Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 49011 - DiY-CMS Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability, Less Critical
OSVDB: 81560
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 12:22Updated: 01/01/2025 23:24
Changes: 03/24/2015 12:22 (57), 02/25/2019 07:08 (4), 01/01/2025 23:24 (20)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.