| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in w-CMS 2.01. This affects the function getContent. The manipulation results in path traversal.
This vulnerability is known as CVE-2012-6522. Furthermore, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in w-CMS 2.01 (Content Management System). Affected is the function getContent. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a path traversal vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-22. The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. CVE summarizes:
Directory traversal vulnerability in the getContent function in codes/wcms.php in w-CMS 2.01 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the p parameter. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
The weakness was published 01/31/2013 (Website). The advisory is available at exploit-db.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2012-6522 since 01/30/2013. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploitation doesn't require any form of authentication. Technical details and a public exploit are known. This vulnerability is assigned to T1006 by the MITRE ATT&CK project.
The exploit is shared for download at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (72302), Exploit-DB (18348), SecurityFocus (BID 51359†), OSVDB (78267†) and Secunia (SA47527†). Similar entry is available at VDB-63451. If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Path traversalCWE: CWE-22
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/10/2012 🔍01/11/2012 🔍
01/30/2013 🔍
01/31/2013 🔍
01/31/2013 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
05/29/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: exploit-db.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2012-6522 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2012-6522
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-63450
X-Force: 72302
SecurityFocus: 51359 - w-CMS HTML Injection and Local File Include Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 47527 - w-CMS Multiple Vulnerabilities, Moderately Critical
OSVDB: 78267
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 12:22Updated: 05/29/2025 14:03
Changes: 03/24/2015 12:22 (57), 02/25/2019 09:09 (4), 05/29/2025 14:03 (20)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.