IBM Rational Policy Tester up to 8.0.1.0 cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in IBM Rational Policy Tester up to 8.0.1.0. Affected is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2013-0532. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in IBM Rational Policy Tester up to 8.0.1.0. This affects some unknown processing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Security AppScan Enterprise 5.6 and 8.x before 8.7 and IBM Rational Policy Tester 5.6 and 8.x before 8.5.0.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that cause a denial of service via malformed HTTP data.
The weakness was shared 03/29/2013 (Website). The advisory is shared at xforce.iss.net. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2013-0532 since 12/16/2012. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
It is declared as highly functional.
Upgrading to version 8.0.1.1 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (82595), SecurityFocus (BID 58683†) and Secunia (SA52765†). The entries VDB-8093, VDB-8094, VDB-63908 and VDB-63907 are related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.ibm.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Highly functional
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Rational Policy Tester 8.0.1.1
Timeline
12/16/2012 🔍03/29/2013 🔍
03/29/2013 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
02/09/2018 🔍
Sources
Vendor: ibm.comAdvisory: xforce.iss.net
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2013-0532 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2013-0532
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-63909
X-Force: 82595 - IBM Rational Appscan cross-site request forgery
SecurityFocus: 58683
Secunia: 52765
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 12:22Updated: 02/09/2018 14:02
Changes: 03/24/2015 12:22 (50), 02/09/2018 14:02 (5)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:1F8:103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.