Rockwell RSLinx Enterprise Cpr9 LogReceiver.exe input validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Rockwell RSLinx Enterprise Cpr9. This affects an unknown part in the library Logger.dll of the file LogReceiver.exe. The manipulation leads to input validation. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2012-4695. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Rockwell RSLinx Enterprise Cpr9. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects some unknown functionality in the library Logger.dll of the file LogReceiver.exe. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. Impacted is availability. The summary by CVE is:
LogReceiver.exe in Rockwell Automation RSLinx Enterprise CPR9, CPR9-SR1, CPR9-SR2, CPR9-SR3, CPR9-SR4, CPR9-SR5, CPR9-SR5.1, and CPR9-SR6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service outage) via a zero-byte UDP packet that is not properly handled by Logger.dll.
The weakness was shared 04/17/2013 by Carsten Eiram (Website). The advisory is shared at ics-cert.us-cert.gov. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2012-4695 since 08/28/2012. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (83275), SecurityFocus (BID 58917†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-39366†). The entries VDB-63993, VDB-63991 and VDB-63990 are related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.5
VulDB Base Score: 7.5
VulDB Temp Score: 7.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
08/28/2012 🔍04/05/2013 🔍
04/05/2013 🔍
04/17/2013 🔍
04/17/2013 🔍
04/25/2013 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
04/28/2017 🔍
Sources
Advisory: ics-cert.us-cert.govResearcher: Carsten Eiram
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2012-4695 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2012-4695
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-63989
X-Force: 83275
SecurityFocus: 58917 - RSLinx Enterprise 'Logger.dll' CVE-2012-4695 Denial of Service Vulnerability
Vulnerability Center: 39366 - Rockwell Automation RSLinx Enterprise LogReceiver.exe Allows Remote DoS via a Crafted UDP Packet, Medium
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 15:54Updated: 04/28/2017 10:00
Changes: 03/24/2015 15:54 (55), 04/28/2017 10:00 (5)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.