Cisco TelePresence Management Suite TMSSNMPService.exe input validation

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in Cisco TelePresence Management Suite. This affects an unknown function of the file TMSSNMPService.exe. The manipulation leads to input validation. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2013-1229. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Cisco TelePresence Management Suite (Unified Communication Software) (the affected version is unknown). It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects an unknown code of the file TMSSNMPService.exe. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. Impacted is availability. The summary by CVE is:
TMSSNMPService.exe in TelePresence Manager in Cisco TelePresence Management Suite (TMS) on 64-bit platforms allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process crash) via SNMP traps, aka Bug ID CSCue00028.
The weakness was released 05/01/2013 with Cisco as CSCue00028 as confirmed security notice (Website). The advisory is shared at tools.cisco.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2013-1229. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 01/02/2022).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (83927), SecurityFocus (BID 59593†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-53272†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.cisco.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/11/2013 🔍04/29/2013 🔍
04/29/2013 🔍
05/01/2013 🔍
05/01/2013 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
10/07/2015 🔍
01/02/2022 🔍
Sources
Vendor: cisco.comAdvisory: CSCue00028
Organization: Cisco
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2013-1229 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2013-1229
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-64061
X-Force: 83927
SecurityFocus: 59593 - Cisco TelePresence Management Suite CVE-2013-1229 Denial of Service Vulnerability
Vulnerability Center: 53272 - Cisco TelePresence Management Suite (TMS) Remote DoS via SNMP Traps, Medium
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 15:54Updated: 01/02/2022 13:10
Changes: 03/24/2015 15:54 (49), 02/03/2018 10:43 (9), 01/02/2022 13:10 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.