| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Gwos GroundWork Monitor 6.7.0. It has been rated as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the file monarch.cgi. This manipulation causes path traversal. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2013-3504. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Gwos GroundWork Monitor 6.7.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function of the file monarch.cgi. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a path traversal vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-22. The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. As an impact it is known to affect integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Directory traversal vulnerability in monarch.cgi in the MONARCH component in GroundWork Monitor Enterprise 6.7.0 allows remote authenticated users to overwrite arbitrary files by leveraging access to the nagios account.
The weakness was shared 05/08/2013 as confirmed advisory (CERT.org). It is possible to read the advisory at kb.cert.org. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2013-3504 since 05/08/2013. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The successful exploitation requires a single authentication. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1006 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The entries VDB-64108, VDB-64107, VDB-64106 and VDB-64105 are related to this item. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.4
VulDB Base Score: 5.4
VulDB Temp Score: 5.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Path traversalCWE: CWE-22
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/08/2013 🔍05/08/2013 🔍
05/08/2013 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
08/13/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: kb.cert.orgStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2013-3504 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2013-3504
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-64099
CERT: 🔍
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 15:54Updated: 08/13/2024 23:32
Changes: 03/24/2015 15:54 (47), 02/18/2018 11:21 (1), 08/13/2024 23:32 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.