Choice-wireless WIXFMR-111 ajax.cgi pip improper authentication
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 9.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Choice-wireless WIXFMR-111. Affected is an unknown function of the file ajax.cgi. Performing a manipulation of the argument pip results in improper authentication. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2013-4731. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as very critical, was found in Choice-wireless WIXFMR-111 (version now known). This affects some unknown processing of the file ajax.cgi. The manipulation of the argument pip with an unknown input leads to a improper authentication vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-287. When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
ajax.cgi in the web interface on the Choice Wireless Green Packet WIXFMR-111 4G WiMax modem allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the pip parameter in an Ajax tag_ipPing request, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-3581.
The weakness was released 06/30/2013 as confirmed advisory (CERT.org). It is possible to read the advisory at kb.cert.org. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2013-4731 since 06/29/2013. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 08/15/2024).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Entry connected to this vulnerability is available at VDB-64391. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.8
VulDB Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Temp Score: 9.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Improper authenticationCWE: CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/29/2013 🔍06/30/2013 🔍
06/30/2013 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
08/15/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: kb.cert.orgStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2013-4731 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2013-4731
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-64371
CERT: 🔍
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 15:54Updated: 08/15/2024 19:34
Changes: 03/24/2015 15:54 (47), 03/16/2019 09:57 (1), 08/15/2024 19:34 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.