| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Mdolon Sharebar 1.2.5. It has been rated as problematic. The affected element is an unknown function. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2013-3491. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Mdolon Sharebar 1.2.5. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Sharebar plugin 1.2.5 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add or (2) modify buttons, or (3) insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences.
The weakness was disclosed 07/16/2013 by Charlie Eriksen (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2013-3491 since 05/07/2013. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (85438), SecurityFocus (BID 60956†), Secunia (SA52948†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-40637†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/07/2013 🔍07/04/2013 🔍
07/04/2013 🔍
07/04/2013 🔍
07/16/2013 🔍
07/16/2013 🔍
07/22/2013 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
05/06/2017 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Researcher: Charlie Eriksen
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2013-3491 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2013-3491
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-64477
X-Force: 85438
SecurityFocus: 60956 - WordPress Sharebar Plugin CVE-2013-3491 Cross Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
Secunia: 52948 - WordPress Sharebar Plugin Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability, Less Critical
Vulnerability Center: 40637 - Sharebar Plugin Before 1.2.5 For WordPress Remote Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability by malicious HTTP Requests, Medium
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 15:54Updated: 05/06/2017 19:24
Changes: 03/24/2015 15:54 (47), 05/06/2017 19:24 (13)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.