Cisco Unified Computing System Administrative Web Interface memory corruption

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Cisco Unified Computing System. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Administrative Web Interface. This manipulation causes memory corruption. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2012-4083. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Cisco Unified Computing System (Virtualization Software) (version unknown). Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function of the component Administrative Web Interface. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple buffer overflows in the administrative web interface in Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) allow remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and session termination) via long string values for unspecified parameters, aka Bug ID CSCtg20751.
The weakness was released 09/20/2013 with Cisco (Website). The advisory is shared at tools.cisco.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2012-4083 since 07/31/2012. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The successful exploitation requires a single authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (87338), SecurityFocus (BID 62525†) and Secunia (SA54952†). Entries connected to this vulnerability are available at VDB-64985, VDB-64982, VDB-64980 and VDB-64979. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.cisco.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.8
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Unproven
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
07/31/2012 🔍09/18/2013 🔍
09/19/2013 🔍
09/20/2013 🔍
09/20/2013 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
01/07/2022 🔍
Sources
Vendor: cisco.comAdvisory: tools.cisco.com
Organization: Cisco
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2012-4083 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2012-4083
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-64981
X-Force: 87338 - Cisco Unified Computing System denial of service
SecurityFocus: 62525 - Cisco Unified Computing System CVE-2012-4083 Remote Denial of Service Vulnerability
Secunia: 54952 - Cisco Unified Computing System Fabric Interconnect Denial of Service Vulnerability, Less Critical
SecurityTracker: 1029066
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 15:54Updated: 01/07/2022 17:16
Changes: 03/24/2015 15:54 (55), 02/18/2018 11:22 (4), 01/07/2022 17:16 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.