Dlink Dir865l up to 1.2 Remote Management hedwig.cgi cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Dlink Dir865l up to 1.2. It has been classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file hedwig.cgi of the component Remote Management. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2013-3095. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Moreover, an exploit is present. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in Dlink Dir865l up to 1.2 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code block of the file hedwig.cgi of the component Remote Management. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in D-Link DIR865L router (Rev. A1) with firmware before 1.05b07 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the administrator password or (2) enable remote management via a request to hedwig.cgi or (3) activate configuration changes via a request to pigwidgeon.cgi.
The weakness was disclosed 11/20/2013 (Website). The advisory is shared at securityevaluators.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2013-3095 since 04/17/2013. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details and also a public exploit are known.
It is possible to download the exploit at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
Upgrading to version 1.03 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Exploit-DB (38481) and Secunia (SA53064†). The entry VDB-8461 is pretty similar. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Dir865l 1.03
Timeline
04/17/2013 🔍11/20/2013 🔍
11/20/2013 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
07/28/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityevaluators.comStatus: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2013-3095 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2013-3095
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-65497
Secunia: 53064
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 15:54Updated: 07/28/2024 11:28
Changes: 03/24/2015 15:54 (46), 02/22/2018 07:09 (6), 07/28/2024 11:28 (25)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.