| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Symphony CMS up to 2.3.1. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation of the argument sort leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2013-7346. The attack may be initiated remotely. In addition, an exploit is available. You should upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Symphony CMS up to 2.3.1 (Content Management System) and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown functionality. The manipulation of the argument sort with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Symphony CMS before 2.3.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct SQL injection attacks via the sort parameter to system/authors/, related to CVE-2013-2559.
The weakness was presented 03/27/2014 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at htbridge.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2013-7346 since 03/27/2014. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details as well as a public exploit are known.
The exploit is available at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
Upgrading to version 2.0.6 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Exploit-DB (39136). See VDB-66801 for similar entry. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: CMS 2.0.6
Timeline
03/27/2014 🔍03/27/2014 🔍
03/27/2014 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
05/09/2026 🔍
Sources
Advisory: htbridge.comStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2013-7346 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2013-7346
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-66803
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 15:54Updated: 05/09/2026 03:13
Changes: 03/24/2015 15:54 (49), 03/07/2019 23:44 (1), 02/17/2025 20:52 (27), 05/09/2026 03:13 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.