| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. The impacted element is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to access control. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2013-7347. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Operating System) and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a access control vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-264. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Luci in Red Hat Conga does not properly enforce the user session timeout, which might allow attackers to gain access to the session by reading the __ac session cookie. NOTE: this issue has been SPLIT due to different vulnerability types. Use CVE-2012-3359 for the base64-encoded storage of the user and password in a cookie.
The weakness was released 03/31/2014 as Bug 607179 as not defined bug report (Bugzilla). The advisory is shared at bugzilla.redhat.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2013-7347 since 03/29/2014. The exploitation is known to be difficult. An attack has to be approached locally. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 05/09/2026). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 63573 (CentOS 5 : conga (CESA-2013:0128)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family CentOS Local Security Checks.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (63573) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-43849†). Entry connected to this vulnerability is available at VDB-66820. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.redhat.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.9
VulDB Base Score: 4.9
VulDB Temp Score: 4.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Access controlCWE: CWE-264
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 63573
Nessus Name: CentOS 5 : conga (CESA-2013:0128)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/29/2014 🔍03/31/2014 🔍
03/31/2014 🔍
03/31/2014 🔍
04/02/2014 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
05/09/2026 🔍
Sources
Vendor: redhat.comAdvisory: Bug 607179
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2013-7347 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2013-7347
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-66821
SecurityFocus: 57322
Vulnerability Center: 43849 - Luci Local Information Disclosure Vulnerability, Low
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 15:54Updated: 05/09/2026 08:24
Changes: 03/24/2015 15:54 (59), 05/24/2017 10:54 (2), 02/06/2022 13:02 (4), 05/09/2026 08:24 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.