Red Hat JBoss 6.3.0 Certificate Validation certificate host validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Red Hat JBoss 6.3.0. It has been classified as critical. Impacted is an unknown function of the component Certificate Validation Handler. The manipulation leads to certificate host validation. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2014-3577. No exploit exists. It is suggested to install a patch to address this issue.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Red Hat JBoss 6.3.0 (Application Server Software). This issue affects an unknown code block of the component Certificate Validation Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a certificate host validation vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-297. The product communicates with a host that provides a certificate, but the product does not properly ensure that the certificate is actually associated with that host. Impacted is confidentiality, and integrity.
The weakness was disclosed 09/04/2014 by Florian Weimer with Red Hat Security Response Team as RHSA-2014:1163 as confirmed advisory (Website). The advisory is shared at rhn.redhat.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2014-3577 since 05/14/2014. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1587.003 for this issue. The advisory points out:
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 is a platform for Java applications based on JBoss Application Server 7. It was found that the fix for CVE-2012-5783 was incomplete: the code added to check that the server host name matches the domain name in a subject's Common Name (CN) field in X.509 certificates was flawed. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to spoof an SSL server using a specially crafted X.509 certificate. (CVE-2012-6153) It was discovered that the HttpClient incorrectly extracted host name from an X.509 certificate subject's Common Name (CN) field. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to spoof an SSL server using a specially crafted X.509 certificate. (CVE-2014-3577)
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 77515 (Oracle Linux 7 : httpcomponents-client (ELSA-2014-1146)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Oracle Linux Local Security Checks. The commercial vulnerability scanner Qualys is able to test this issue with plugin 350319 (Amazon Linux Security Advisory for jakarta-commons-httpclient: ALAS-2014-410).
Applying the patch 1129074 is able to eliminate this problem. The bugfix is ready for download at access.redhat.com. A possible mitigation has been published immediately after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (95327), Tenable (77515), SecurityFocus (BID 69258†), OSVDB (110143†) and Secunia (SA60713†). rhn.redhat.com is providing further details. The entries VDB-70806 and VDB-121642 are pretty similar. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.redhat.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.2
VulDB Base Score: 6.5
VulDB Temp Score: 6.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Certificate host validationCWE: CWE-297 / CWE-295 / CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 77515
Nessus Name: Oracle Linux 7 : httpcomponents-client (ELSA-2014-1146)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Port: 🔍
OpenVAS ID: 14611
OpenVAS Name: Amazon Linux Local Check: ALAS-2014-410
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍
Qualys ID: 🔍
Qualys Name: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: PatchStatus: 🔍
Reaction Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍
Patch: 1129074
Timeline
05/14/2014 🔍08/12/2014 🔍
08/12/2014 🔍
08/21/2014 🔍
08/28/2014 🔍
09/04/2014 🔍
09/04/2014 🔍
09/04/2014 🔍
09/05/2014 🔍
09/07/2014 🔍
09/08/2014 🔍
02/15/2022 🔍
Sources
Vendor: redhat.comAdvisory: RHSA-2014:1163
Researcher: Florian Weimer
Organization: Red Hat Security Response Team
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2014-3577 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2014-3577
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-67457
OVAL: 🔍
X-Force: 95327
SecurityFocus: 69258 - Apache HttpComponents Incomplete Fix CVE-2014-3577 SSL Validation Security Bypass Vulnerability
Secunia: 60713 - Apache HttpComponents HttpClient / Apache HttpComponents HttpAsyncClient X.509 Certificate, Not Critical
OSVDB: 110143
SecurityTracker: 1030812 - Red Hat JBoss Certificate Validation Flaw Lets Remote Users Spoof SSL Servers
Vulnerability Center: 46002 - Apache HttpClient and HttpAsyncClient Remote Spoofing Vulnerability due to Improper Server Hostname Verification, Medium
Misc.: 🔍
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 09/08/2014 12:18Updated: 02/15/2022 09:50
Changes: 09/08/2014 12:18 (83), 06/05/2017 10:52 (12), 02/15/2022 09:44 (3), 02/15/2022 09:46 (1), 02/15/2022 09:50 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:004:103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.