Festo CECX-X-M1 Modular Controller improper authentication
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 9.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Festo CECX-X-M1 Modular Controller. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. Performing a manipulation results in improper authentication. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2014-0769. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Festo CECX-X-M1 Modular Controller (affected version not known). It has been classified as critical. This affects some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a improper authentication vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-287. When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The Festo CECX-X-C1 Modular Master Controller with CoDeSys and CECX-X-M1 Modular Controller with CoDeSys and SoftMotion do not require authentication for connections to certain TCP ports, which allows remote attackers to (1) modify the configuration via a request to the debug service on port 4000 or (2) delete log entries via a request to the log service on port 4001.
The weakness was disclosed 04/25/2014 with IOActive (Website). The advisory is shared at ics-cert.us-cert.gov. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2014-0769 since 01/02/2014. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (92893), EUVD (EUVD-2014-0800), SecurityFocus (BID 67067†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-48477†). The entry VDB-69476 is pretty similar. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.8
VulDB Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Temp Score: 9.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Improper authenticationCWE: CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/02/2014 🔍04/24/2014 🔍
04/24/2014 🔍
04/25/2014 🔍
04/25/2014 🔍
02/05/2015 🔍
03/25/2015 🔍
07/03/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: ics-cert.us-cert.govOrganization: IOActive
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2014-0769 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2014-0769
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-69477
EUVD: 🔍
X-Force: 92893
SecurityFocus: 67067 - Festo CECX-X-C1 And CECX-X-M1 Controllers Multiple Authentication Bypass Vulnerabilities
Vulnerability Center: 48477 - Festo Modular Master Controller with CoDeSys Remote Security Bypass Vulnerability, Critical
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/25/2015 16:45Updated: 07/03/2025 01:14
Changes: 03/25/2015 16:45 (52), 06/19/2017 08:31 (4), 07/03/2025 00:13 (24), 07/03/2025 01:14 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.