| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 9.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Rocketsoftware Rocket Servergraph. It has been rated as critical. The affected element is an unknown function of the component Admin Center. This manipulation causes code injection. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2014-3915. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as very critical was found in Rocketsoftware Rocket Servergraph (version unknown). Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function of the component Admin Center. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a code injection vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-94. The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The userRequest servlet in the Admin Center for Tivoli Storage Manager in Rocket Servergraph allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a (1) auth, (2) auth_session, (3) auth_simple, (4) add, (5) add_flat, (6) remove, (7) set_pwd, (8) add_permissions, (9) revoke_permissions, (10) runAsync, or (11) tsmRequest command.
The weakness was released 06/11/2014 by Andrea Micalizzi (rgod) (Website). The advisory is shared at zerodayinitiative.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2014-3915 since 05/29/2014. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 03/04/2018). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 67780†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.8
VulDB Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Temp Score: 9.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Code injectionCWE: CWE-94 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/29/2014 🔍06/02/2014 🔍
06/11/2014 🔍
06/11/2014 🔍
03/26/2015 🔍
03/04/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: zerodayinitiative.comResearcher: Andrea Micalizzi (rgod)
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2014-3915 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2014-3915
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-70021
SecurityFocus: 67780 - Rocket Servergraph 'userRequest' Servlet Remote Command Injection Vulnerability
Entry
Created: 03/26/2015 12:07Updated: 03/04/2018 21:40
Changes: 03/26/2015 12:07 (45), 03/04/2018 21:40 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.