buffercode Random Banner 1.1.2.1 buffercode_RBanner_url_banner1 cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in buffercode Random Banner 1.1.2.1. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. Performing a manipulation of the argument buffercode_RBanner_url_banner1 results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability was named CVE-2014-4847. The attack may be initiated remotely. In addition, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in buffercode Random Banner 1.1.2.1. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown functionality. The manipulation of the argument buffercode_RBanner_url_banner1 with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Random Banner plugin 1.1.2.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the buffercode_RBanner_url_banner1 parameter in an update action to wp-admin/options.php.
The weakness was presented 07/10/2014 with Ashiyane Digital Security Team as File 127292/Wor (Packetstorm). It is possible to read the advisory at packetstormsecurity.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2014-4847 since 07/10/2014. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details and a public exploit are known. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 68280†). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/29/2014 🔍07/10/2014 🔍
07/10/2014 🔍
07/10/2014 🔍
03/26/2015 🔍
03/11/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: File 127292/WorOrganization: Ashiyane Digital Security Team
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2014-4847 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2014-4847
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-70323
SecurityFocus: 68280
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 03/26/2015 12:07Updated: 03/11/2018 13:49
Changes: 03/26/2015 12:07 (47), 03/11/2018 13:49 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.