ARRIS Touchstone TG862G/CT Telephony Gateway up to 7.6.59s.ct computer_name cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in ARRIS Touchstone TG862G and CT Telephony Gateway up to 7.6.59s.ct. This affects an unknown part. This manipulation of the argument computer_name causes cross site scripting. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2014-5438. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in ARRIS Touchstone TG862G and CT Telephony Gateway up to 7.6.59s.ct and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code. The manipulation of the argument computer_name with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ARRIS Touchstone TG862G/CT Telephony Gateway with firmware 7.6.59S.CT and earlier allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the computer_name parameter to connected_devices_computers_edit.php.
The weakness was presented 12/17/2014 as not defined mailinglist post (Full-Disclosure). The advisory is shared at seclists.org. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2014-5438 since 08/22/2014. The attack can be launched remotely. A single authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
See VDB-73272 for similar entry. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
- 7.6.59s.ca
- 7.6.59s.cb
- 7.6.59s.cc
- 7.6.59s.cd
- 7.6.59s.ce
- 7.6.59s.cf
- 7.6.59s.cg
- 7.6.59s.ch
- 7.6.59s.ci
- 7.6.59s.cj
- 7.6.59s.ck
- 7.6.59s.cl
- 7.6.59s.cm
- 7.6.59s.cn
- 7.6.59s.co
- 7.6.59s.cp
- 7.6.59s.cq
- 7.6.59s.cr
- 7.6.59s.cs
- 7.6.59s.ct
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.5
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
08/22/2014 🔍12/17/2014 🔍
12/17/2014 🔍
03/27/2015 🔍
04/02/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: seclists.orgStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2014-5438 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2014-5438
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-73273
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/27/2015 14:56Updated: 04/02/2018 11:41
Changes: 03/27/2015 14:56 (42), 04/02/2018 11:41 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.