yURL ReTwitt up to 1.4 yurl_anchor cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in yURL ReTwitt up to 1.4. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown function. Performing a manipulation of the argument yurl_anchor results in cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability was named CVE-2014-9341. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in yURL ReTwitt up to 1.4. This affects an unknown code block. The manipulation of the argument yurl_anchor with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the yURL ReTwitt plugin 1.4 and earlier for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the (1) yurl_login or (2) yurl_anchor parameter in the yurl page to wp-admin/options-general.php.
The weakness was presented 12/19/2014 as File 129582/Wor (Packetstorm). It is possible to read the advisory at packetstormsecurity.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2014-9341 since 12/07/2014. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/07/2014 🔍12/19/2014 🔍
12/19/2014 🔍
03/27/2015 🔍
04/02/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: File 129582/WorStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2014-9341 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2014-9341
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-73323
Entry
Created: 03/27/2015 14:56Updated: 04/02/2018 11:45
Changes: 03/27/2015 14:56 (40), 04/02/2018 11:45 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.