D-Link DCS-931l up to 1.04 Authentication cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in D-Link DCS-931l up to 1.04. It has been rated as problematic. Impacted is an unknown function of the component Authentication. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2015-2048. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in D-Link DCS-931l up to 1.04. This affects an unknown function of the component Authentication. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in D-Link DCS-931L with firmware 1.04 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.
The weakness was disclosed 02/23/2015 (Website). The advisory is shared at securityadvisories.dlink.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2015-2048 since 02/23/2015. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 04/13/2018).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The entry VDB-74278 is pretty similar. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.dlink.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
02/23/2015 🔍02/23/2015 🔍
02/23/2015 🔍
03/30/2015 🔍
04/13/2018 🔍
Sources
Vendor: dlink.comAdvisory: securityadvisories.dlink.com
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2015-2048 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2015-2048
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-74277
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/30/2015 12:19Updated: 04/13/2018 11:44
Changes: 03/30/2015 12:19 (42), 04/13/2018 11:44 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.