Squid Proxy up to 3.2.13/3.3.13/3.4.12/3.5.3 SSL-Bump Certificate Validator input validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Squid Proxy up to 3.2.13/3.3.13/3.4.12/3.5.3. The affected element is an unknown function of the component SSL-Bump Certificate Validator. The manipulation results in input validation. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2015-3455. No exploit is available. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Squid Proxy up to 3.2.13/3.3.13/3.4.12/3.5.3 (Firewall Software). Affected is an unknown function of the component SSL-Bump Certificate Validator. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, and integrity.
The weakness was published 05/01/2015 as SQUID-2015:1 as confirmed advisory (Website). The advisory is shared for download at squid-cache.org. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2015-3455 since 04/29/2015. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploitation doesn't require any form of authentication. There are neither technical details nor an exploit publicly available. The advisory points out:
The bug is important because it allows remote servers to bypass client certificate validation. Some attackers may also be able to use valid certificates for one domain signed by a global Certificate Authority to abuse an unrelated domain.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 2 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $5k-$25k. The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 83276 (Mandriva Linux Security Advisory : squid (MDVSA-2015:230)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Mandriva Local Security Checks. The commercial vulnerability scanner Qualys is able to test this issue with plugin 276088 (Fedora Security Update for squid (FEDORA-2016-7b40eb9e29)). The advisory illustrates:
However, the bug is exploitable only if you have configured Squid to perform SSL Bumping with the "client-first" or "bump" mode of operation.
Applying a patch is able to eliminate this problem. A possible mitigation has been published immediately after the disclosure of the vulnerability. The advisory contains the following remark:
Sites that do not use SSL-Bump are not vulnerable.Furthermore it is possible to detect and prevent this kind of attack with TippingPoint and the filter 22091.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (102789), Tenable (83276), SecurityFocus (BID 74438†), SecurityTracker (ID 1032221†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-50733†). Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
- 3.2.0
- 3.2.1
- 3.2.2
- 3.2.3
- 3.2.4
- 3.2.5
- 3.2.6
- 3.2.7
- 3.2.8
- 3.2.9
- 3.2.10
- 3.2.11
- 3.2.12
- 3.2.13
- 3.3.0
- 3.3.1
- 3.3.2
- 3.3.3
- 3.3.4
- 3.3.5
- 3.3.6
- 3.3.7
- 3.3.8
- 3.3.9
- 3.3.10
- 3.3.11
- 3.3.12
- 3.3.13
- 3.4.0
- 3.4.1
- 3.4.2
- 3.4.3
- 3.4.4
- 3.4.5
- 3.4.6
- 3.4.7
- 3.4.8
- 3.4.9
- 3.4.10
- 3.4.11
- 3.4.12
- 3.5.0
- 3.5.1
- 3.5.2
- 3.5.3
License
Website
- Vendor: http://www.squid-cache.org/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Base Score: 6.5
VulDB Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Unproven
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 83276
Nessus Name: Mandriva Linux Security Advisory : squid (MDVSA-2015:230)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Port: 🔍
OpenVAS ID: 103320
OpenVAS Name: Squid SSL-Bump Certificate Validation Bypass Vulnerability
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍
Qualys ID: 🔍
Qualys Name: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: PatchStatus: 🔍
Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍
TippingPoint: 🔍
Fortigate IPS: 🔍
Timeline
04/29/2015 🔍04/29/2015 🔍
05/01/2015 🔍
05/01/2015 🔍
05/01/2015 🔍
05/02/2015 🔍
05/02/2015 🔍
05/02/2015 🔍
05/07/2015 🔍
05/18/2015 🔍
06/28/2015 🔍
05/10/2022 🔍
Sources
Vendor: squid-cache.orgAdvisory: SQUID-2015:1
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2015-3455 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2015-3455
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-75180
X-Force: 102789 - Squid X509 security bypass
SecurityFocus: 74438 - SQUID CVE-2015-3455 SSL Certificate Validation Security Bypass Vulnerability
SecurityTracker: 1032221 - Squid SSL-Bump Certificate Validation Flaw Lets Remote Servers Bypass Client-side Certificate Validation
Vulnerability Center: 50733 - Squid 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5 Remote SSL Servers Spoofing via Valid Certificates, Low
Entry
Created: 05/02/2015 18:52Updated: 05/10/2022 08:55
Changes: 05/02/2015 18:52 (85), 07/01/2017 20:00 (5), 05/10/2022 08:51 (3), 05/10/2022 08:55 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.