| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Rockwell RSView32 up to 7.60.00. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Credential Handler. The manipulation leads to cryptographic issue. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2015-1010. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Rockwell RSView32 up to 7.60.00. This issue affects an unknown functionality of the component Credential Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cryptographic issue vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-310. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Rockwell Automation RSView32 7.60.00 (aka CPR9 SR4) and earlier does not properly encrypt credentials, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading a file and conducting a decryption attack.
The weakness was shared 05/31/2015 (Website). The advisory is shared at ics-cert.us-cert.gov. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2015-1010 since 01/10/2015. An attack has to be approached locally. The successful exploitation needs a simple authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1600 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 74835†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-50780†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
- 7.0
- 7.1
- 7.2
- 7.3
- 7.4
- 7.5
- 7.6
- 7.7
- 7.8
- 7.9
- 7.10
- 7.11
- 7.12
- 7.13
- 7.14
- 7.15
- 7.16
- 7.17
- 7.18
- 7.19
- 7.20
- 7.21
- 7.22
- 7.23
- 7.24
- 7.25
- 7.26
- 7.27
- 7.28
- 7.29
- 7.30
- 7.31
- 7.32
- 7.33
- 7.34
- 7.35
- 7.36
- 7.37
- 7.38
- 7.39
- 7.40
- 7.41
- 7.42
- 7.43
- 7.44
- 7.45
- 7.46
- 7.47
- 7.48
- 7.49
- 7.50
- 7.51
- 7.52
- 7.53
- 7.54
- 7.55
- 7.56
- 7.57
- 7.58
- 7.59
- 7.60.00
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cryptographic issueCWE: CWE-310
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/10/2015 🔍05/26/2015 🔍
05/26/2015 🔍
05/31/2015 🔍
05/31/2015 🔍
06/01/2015 🔍
06/30/2015 🔍
07/02/2017 🔍
Sources
Advisory: ics-cert.us-cert.govStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2015-1010 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2015-1010
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-75629
SecurityFocus: 74835 - Rockwell Automation RSView32 CVE-2015-1010 Weak Encryption Algorithm Security Weakness
Vulnerability Center: 50780 - Rockwell Automation RSView32 <=7.60.00 Local Information Disclosure due to Improper Credentials Encryption, Medium
Entry
Created: 06/01/2015 10:07Updated: 07/02/2017 12:07
Changes: 06/01/2015 10:07 (53), 07/02/2017 12:07 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.