GE Healthcare CADStream Server Password credentials management

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
7.3$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in GE Healthcare CADStream Server. It has been rated as critical. This affects an unknown function. This manipulation of the argument Password with the input confirma causes credentials management. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2010-5309. There is no exploit available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability has been found in GE Healthcare CADStream Server (Medical Device Software) (version unknown) and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function. The manipulation of the argument Password with the input value confirma leads to a credentials management vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-255. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

GE Healthcare CADStream Server has a default password of confirma for the admin user, which has unspecified impact and attack vectors.

The weakness was shared 08/04/2015 (Website). The advisory is shared at twitter.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2010-5309 since 09/29/2014. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1552 for this issue.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

The entries VDB-76898, VDB-76899, VDB-76900 and VDB-76901 are related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Type

Vendor

Name

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.3

VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Credentials management
CWE: CWE-255
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

09/29/2014 🔍
08/04/2015 +309 days 🔍
08/04/2015 +0 days 🔍
08/05/2015 +1 days 🔍
05/13/2018 +1012 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: ge.com

Advisory: twitter.com
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2010-5309 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2010-5309
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-76909
See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 08/05/2015 10:06
Updated: 05/13/2018 10:36
Changes: 08/05/2015 10:06 (41), 05/13/2018 10:36 (8)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Do you need the next level of professionalism?

Upgrade your account now!