| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in librsync up to 0.9. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Block Match Handler. The manipulation results in cryptographic issue. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2014-8242. No exploit exists. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in librsync up to 0.9 (File Transfer Software). It has been classified as critical. Affected is some unknown processing of the component Block Match Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cryptographic issue vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-310. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. CVE summarizes:
librsync before 1.0.0 uses a truncated MD4 checksum to match blocks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to modify transmitted data via a birthday attack.
The weakness was disclosed 10/26/2015 (Website). The advisory is available at github.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2014-8242 since 10/12/2014. The exploitability is told to be difficult. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploitation doesn't require any form of authentication. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not available. This vulnerability is assigned to T1600 by the MITRE ATT&CK project.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 81716 (Fedora 22 : csync2-1.34-15.fc22 / duplicity-0.6.25-3.fc22 / librsync-1.0.0-1.fc22 / etc (2015-2923)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Fedora Local Security Checks. The commercial vulnerability scanner Qualys is able to test this issue with plugin 168417 (SUSE Enterprise Linux Security update for rsync (SUSE-SU-2016:0176-1)).
Upgrading to version 1.0.0 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Tenable (81716). If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.4
VulDB Base Score: 5.6
VulDB Temp Score: 5.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cryptographic issueCWE: CWE-310
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 81716
Nessus Name: Fedora 22 : csync2-1.34-15.fc22 / duplicity-0.6.25-3.fc22 / librsync-1.0.0-1.fc22 / etc (2015-2923)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
OpenVAS ID: 867773
OpenVAS Name: Fedora Update for rdiff-backup FEDORA-2015-3497
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍
Qualys ID: 🔍
Qualys Name: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: librsync 1.0.0
Timeline
10/12/2014 🔍10/26/2015 🔍
10/26/2015 🔍
10/27/2015 🔍
06/25/2022 🔍
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2014-8242 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2014-8242
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-78882
Entry
Created: 10/27/2015 08:46Updated: 06/25/2022 06:04
Changes: 10/27/2015 08:46 (54), 02/19/2018 09:14 (6), 06/25/2022 05:52 (3), 06/25/2022 06:04 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.