Infinite Automation Mango Automation up to 2.6.0 Build 430 os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Infinite Automation Mango Automation up to 2.6.0 Build 430. The impacted element is an unknown function. Such manipulation leads to os command injection. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2015-7901. Moreover, an exploit is present.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Infinite Automation Mango Automation up to 2.6.0 Build 430 (Automation Software). Affected by this issue is an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. CVE summarizes:
Infinite Automation Mango Automation 2.5.x and 2.6.x through 2.6.0 build 430 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary OS commands via unspecified vectors.
The weakness was disclosed 10/28/2015 (Website). The advisory is shared for download at ics-cert.us-cert.gov. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2015-7901 since 10/22/2015. The attack may be launched remotely. The successful exploitation requires a simple authentication. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available. The MITRE ATT&CK project declares the attack technique as T1202.
A public exploit has been developed by James Fitts and been published 3 years after the advisory. The exploit is available at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Exploit-DB (42698). The entries VDB-78926, VDB-78927, VDB-78931 and VDB-78933 are pretty similar. Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Author: James Fitts
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exploit Delay Time: 🔍
Timeline
10/22/2015 🔍10/28/2015 🔍
10/28/2015 🔍
10/29/2015 🔍
09/13/2017 🔍
09/13/2017 🔍
09/01/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: ics-cert.us-cert.govStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2015-7901 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2015-7901
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-78932
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 10/29/2015 09:02Updated: 09/01/2024 23:07
Changes: 10/29/2015 09:02 (48), 02/23/2018 09:10 (8), 09/01/2024 23:07 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:6B7:103
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.