Cisco Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillment 10.6(3) RBAC information disclosure

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Cisco Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillment 10.6(3) and classified as critical. The affected element is an unknown function of the component RBAC. This manipulation causes information disclosure. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2015-6404. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in Cisco Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillment 10.6(3) (Groupware Software) and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part of the component RBAC. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a information disclosure vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-200. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Cisco Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillment 10.6(3) does not use RBAC, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive credential information by leveraging admin access and making SOAP API requests, aka Bug ID CSCuw84374.
The weakness was shared 12/15/2015 as CSCuw84374 as confirmed advisory (Website). The advisory is shared at tools.cisco.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2015-6404 since 08/17/2015. The attack can be launched remotely. A single authentication is necessary for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 05/14/2018). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 78874†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-55228†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.cisco.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Information disclosureCWE: CWE-200 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
08/17/2015 🔍12/10/2015 🔍
12/14/2015 🔍
12/15/2015 🔍
12/15/2015 🔍
12/16/2015 🔍
05/14/2018 🔍
Sources
Vendor: cisco.comAdvisory: CSCuw84374
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2015-6404 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2015-6404
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-79789
SecurityFocus: 78874
Vulnerability Center: 55228 - [cisco-sa-20151210-hcm] Cisco Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillment 10.6(3) Remote Information Disclosure, Medium
Entry
Created: 12/16/2015 09:46Updated: 05/14/2018 10:42
Changes: 12/16/2015 09:46 (49), 05/14/2018 10:42 (7)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.