Mediabridge Medialink MWN-WAPR300N 5.07.50 HTTP Cookie access control
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in Mediabridge Medialink MWN-WAPR300N 5.07.50. The affected element is an unknown function of the component HTTP Cookie Handler. Performing a manipulation results in access control. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2015-5995. Furthermore, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Mediabridge Medialink MWN-WAPR300N 5.07.50. This affects an unknown code of the component HTTP Cookie Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a access control vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-264. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Mediabridge Medialink MWN-WAPR300N devices with firmware 5.07.50 and Tenda N3 Wireless N150 devices allow remote attackers to obtain administrative access via a certain admin substring in an HTTP Cookie header.
The weakness was published 12/31/2015 (Website). The advisory is shared at kb.cert.org. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2015-5995 since 08/14/2015. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
A public exploit has been developed by Mandeep Jadon and been published before and not just after the advisory. The exploit is shared for download at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 119 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Exploit-DB (41402). Similar entries are available at VDB-79964 and VDB-79966. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.4
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Access controlCWE: CWE-264
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Author: Mandeep Jadon
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
08/14/2015 🔍09/03/2015 🔍
09/03/2015 🔍
12/31/2015 🔍
12/31/2015 🔍
01/02/2016 🔍
11/08/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: kb.cert.orgStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2015-5995 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2015-5995
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-79965
CERT: 🔍
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 01/02/2016 17:39Updated: 11/08/2024 11:59
Changes: 01/02/2016 17:39 (56), 05/25/2018 10:16 (8), 08/17/2024 21:52 (17), 11/08/2024 11:59 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:FAC:103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.