Cisco VDS-IS 3.3(0)/3.3(1)/4.0(0)/4.1(0) TCP Implementation TCP FIN Packet resource management

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Cisco VDS-IS 3.3(0)/3.3(1)/4.0(0)/4.1(0). Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component TCP Implementation. The manipulation as part of TCP FIN Packet leads to resource management. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2016-1353. No exploit is available. It is recommended to apply restrictive firewalling.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Cisco VDS-IS 3.3(0)/3.3(1)/4.0(0)/4.1(0). It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown functionality of the component TCP Implementation. The manipulation as part of a TCP FIN Packet leads to a resource management vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-399. Impacted is availability. The summary by CVE is:
The TCP implementation in Cisco Videoscape Distribution Suite for Internet Streaming (VDS-IS) 3.3(0), 3.3(1), 4.0(0), and 4.1(0) does not properly initiate new TCP sessions when a previous session is in a FIN wait state, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (TCP outage) via vectors involving FIN packets, aka Bug ID CSCuy45136.
The weakness was published 03/01/2016 with Cisco as CSCuy45136 as confirmed advisory (Website). The advisory is shared at tools.cisco.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2016-1353 since 01/03/2016. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
Addressing this vulnerability is possible by firewalling .
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 83628†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-57016†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.cisco.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.2
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.3
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Resource managementCWE: CWE-399 / CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: FirewallStatus: 🔍
Timeline
01/03/2016 🔍02/25/2016 🔍
02/28/2016 🔍
02/29/2016 🔍
03/01/2016 🔍
03/01/2016 🔍
03/05/2016 🔍
07/08/2022 🔍
Sources
Vendor: cisco.comAdvisory: CSCuy45136
Organization: Cisco
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2016-1353 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2016-1353
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-81125
SecurityFocus: 83628 - Cisco Videoscape Distribution Suite for Internet Streaming Remote Denial of Service Vulnerability
SecurityTracker: 1035123
Vulnerability Center: 57016 - [cisco-sa-20160226-vds-is] Cisco Videoscape Distribution Suite for Internet Streaming Remote DoS in TCP Session Handling, Medium
Entry
Created: 03/01/2016 09:23Updated: 07/08/2022 16:25
Changes: 03/01/2016 09:23 (64), 09/01/2018 08:45 (5), 07/08/2022 16:25 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.