| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in ICONICS WebHMI up to 9. The impacted element is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in path traversal. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2016-2289. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in ICONICS WebHMI up to 9. This affects an unknown code. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a path traversal vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-22. The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, and integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Directory traversal vulnerability in ICONICS WebHMI 9 and earlier allows remote attackers to read configuration files, and consequently discover password hashes, via unspecified vectors.
The weakness was released 04/01/2016 by Maxim Rupp (Website). The advisory is shared at ics-cert.us-cert.gov. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2016-2289 since 02/09/2016. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1006 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 85765†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-57885†). Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.5
VulDB Base Score: 7.5
VulDB Temp Score: 7.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Path traversalCWE: CWE-22
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
Timeline
02/09/2016 🔍03/31/2016 🔍
04/01/2016 🔍
04/01/2016 🔍
04/01/2016 🔍
04/04/2016 🔍
04/05/2016 🔍
02/03/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: ics-cert.us-cert.govResearcher: Maxim Rupp
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2016-2289 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2016-2289
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-81561
SecurityFocus: 85765 - ICONICS WebHMI CVE-2016-2289 Directory Traversal Vulnerability
Vulnerability Center: 57885 - ICONICS WebHMI <=9 Remote Directory Traversal Vulnerability, Medium
Entry
Created: 04/04/2016 11:16Updated: 02/03/2019 10:40
Changes: 04/04/2016 11:16 (52), 02/03/2019 10:40 (12)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:B19:103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.