| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in XMB Forum. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file forumdisplay.php. Performing a manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. Additionally, an exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in XMB Forum (Forum Software) (affected version not known). This affects some unknown functionality of the file forumdisplay.php. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-80. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as "<", ">", and "&" that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages. This is going to have an impact on integrity.
The weakness was released 03/26/2004 by Janek Vind "waraxe" (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at archives.neohapsis.com. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details and a exploit are known. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
After even before and not, there has been an exploit disclosed. It is declared as proof-of-concept. By approaching the search of inurl:forumdisplay.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at OSVDB (14988†) and Secunia (SA11230†). Entries connected to this vulnerability are available at VDB-21690, VDB-21691, VDB-22936 and VDB-23466. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.3
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-80 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Google Hack: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/26/2004 🔍03/26/2004 🔍
03/29/2004 🔍
03/29/2004 🔍
04/14/2016 🔍
10/07/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: archives.neohapsis.comResearcher: Janek Vind "waraxe"
Status: Not defined
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-82371
Secunia: 11230 - XMB Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities, Less Critical
OSVDB: 14988 - XMB Forum forumdisplay.php Multiple Parameter XSS
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 04/14/2016 16:43Updated: 10/07/2018 08:42
Changes: 04/14/2016 16:43 (44), 10/07/2018 08:42 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.