EMC RSA Data Loss Prevention up to 9.6 SP4 cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in EMC RSA Data Loss Prevention up to 9.6 SP4. The affected element is an unknown function. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross site scripting. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2016-0892. The attack may be performed from remote. There is no available exploit. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in EMC RSA Data Loss Prevention up to 9.6 SP4 (Data Loss Prevention Software). This vulnerability affects an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, and integrity. CVE summarizes:
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in EMC RSA Data Loss Prevention 9.6 before SP2 P5 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
The weakness was presented 05/02/2016 as ESA-2016-041 as confirmed advisory (Website). The advisory is shared for download at seclists.org. This vulnerability was named CVE-2016-0892 since 12/17/2015. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is required for a successful exploitation. Successful exploitation requires user interaction by the victim. There are neither technical details nor an exploit publicly available. The MITRE ATT&CK project declares the attack technique as T1059.007.
Applying the patch 9.6 SP2 P5 is able to eliminate this problem. A possible mitigation has been published immediately after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at X-Force (112813). See VDB-83189, VDB-83190 and VDB-83191 for similar entries. Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.dellemc.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.4
VulDB Base Score: 5.4
VulDB Temp Score: 4.7
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Unproven
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: PatchStatus: 🔍
Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍
Patch: 9.6 SP2 P5
Timeline
12/17/2015 🔍05/02/2016 🔍
05/02/2016 🔍
05/03/2016 🔍
05/03/2016 🔍
07/28/2022 🔍
Sources
Vendor: dellemc.comAdvisory: ESA-2016-041
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2016-0892 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2016-0892
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-83188
X-Force: 112813 - EMC RSA Data Loss Prevention cross-site scripting
SecurityTracker: 1035714
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 05/03/2016 12:52Updated: 07/28/2022 00:23
Changes: 05/03/2016 12:52 (43), 11/08/2018 10:58 (21), 07/28/2022 00:23 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.