| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in cPanel. This affects an unknown function of the file dodelpop.html. This manipulation of the argument email causes cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in cPanel (Hosting Control Software) (version now known). It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown processing of the file dodelpop.html. The manipulation of the argument email with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-80. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as "<", ">", and "&" that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages. As an impact it is known to affect integrity.
The weakness was shared 02/02/2006 by Simo Ben Youssef (Full-Disclosure). The advisory is shared at archives.neohapsis.com. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details and also a exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
After before and not just, there has been an exploit disclosed. It is declared as proof-of-concept. By approaching the search of inurl:dodelpop.html it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at OSVDB (22937†) and Secunia (SA18695†). The entries VDB-28605, VDB-28604, VDB-83510 and VDB-83511 are related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.3
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-80 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Google Hack: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
02/02/2006 🔍02/02/2006 🔍
02/06/2006 🔍
05/05/2016 🔍
11/16/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: archives.neohapsis.comResearcher: Simo Ben Youssef
Status: Not defined
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-83509
Secunia: 18695
OSVDB: 22937 - cPanel dodelpop.html email Parameter XSS
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 05/05/2016 18:28Updated: 11/16/2018 08:35
Changes: 05/05/2016 18:28 (41), 11/16/2018 08:35 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.