| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in CMScout. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2006-2188. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in CMScout (version unknown). This issue affects an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-80. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as "<", ">", and "&" that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages. Impacted is integrity.
The weakness was shared 05/02/2006 by Nomenumbra and [0x4F4C] as not defined posting (Bugtraq). The advisory is shared at archives.neohapsis.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2006-2188. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are unknown but an exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
After before and not just, there has been an exploit disclosed. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 17796†), OSVDB (25247†), Secunia (SA19933†) and SecurityTracker (ID 1016023†). The entry VDB-30054 is related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.3
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-80 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/02/2006 🔍05/02/2006 🔍
05/02/2006 🔍
05/04/2006 🔍
05/04/2006 🔍
05/04/2006 🔍
05/08/2016 🔍
03/15/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: archives.neohapsis.comResearcher: Nomenumbra, [0x4F4C]
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2006-2188 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2006-2188
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-83909
X-Force: 26223
SecurityFocus: 17796 - CmScout Multiple HTML Injection Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 19933 - CMScout Multiple Script Insertion Vulnerabilities, Moderately Critical
OSVDB: 25247 - CMScout BBCode Tag XSS
SecurityTracker: 1016023
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 05/08/2016 19:14Updated: 03/15/2025 04:26
Changes: 05/08/2016 19:14 (46), 11/22/2018 08:47 (4), 07/30/2022 07:31 (4), 07/30/2022 07:36 (8), 03/15/2025 04:26 (15)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.