Symantec Critical System Protection/Data Center Security injection

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
6.6$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in Symantec Critical System Protection and Data Center Security. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to injection. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2015-8800. There is no available exploit. Upgrading the affected component is advised.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Symantec Critical System Protection and Data Center Security (version unknown) and classified as critical. This issue affects an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a injection vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-74. The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

Symantec Embedded Security: Critical System Protection (SES:CSP) 1.0.x before 1.0 MP5, Embedded Security: Critical System Protection for Controllers and Devices (SES:CSP) 6.5.0 before MP1, Critical System Protection (SCSP) before 5.2.9 MP6, Data Center Security: Server Advanced Server (DCS:SA) 6.x before 6.5 MP1 and 6.6 before MP1, and Data Center Security: Server Advanced Server and Agents (DCS:SA) through 6.6 MP1 allow remote authenticated users to conduct argument-injection attacks by leveraging certain named-pipe access.

The weakness was presented 06/07/2016 by Markus Wulftange with Code White as not defined advisory (Website). The advisory is shared at symantec.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2015-8800 since 02/02/2016. The attack may be initiated remotely. The successful exploitation requires a simple authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1055 for this issue.

The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 80911 (Symantec Critical System Protection 5.2.9.x < 5.2.9 MP6 Multiple Vulnerabilities (SYM15-001 / SYM16-009)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Windows and running in the context l. The commercial vulnerability scanner Qualys is able to test this issue with plugin 370094 (Symantec Embedded Security: Critical System Protection and Symantec Data Center Security: Server Advanced, Multiple Vulnerabilities).

Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published immediately after the disclosure of the vulnerability.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (80911) and SecurityFocus (BID 90886†). See VDB-73718, VDB-73711, VDB-87770 and VDB-87771 for similar entries. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.8
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.6

VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 7.3
NVD Vector: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Injection
CWE: CWE-74 / CWE-707 / CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Nessus ID: 80911
Nessus Name: Symantec Critical System Protection 5.2.9.x < 5.2.9 MP6 Multiple Vulnerabilities (SYM15-001 / SYM16-009)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Context: 🔍

Qualys ID: 🔍
Qualys Name: 🔍

Exploit-DB: 🔍

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

01/22/2015 🔍
02/02/2016 +376 days 🔍
06/07/2016 +126 days 🔍
06/07/2016 +0 days 🔍
06/07/2016 +0 days 🔍
06/08/2016 +1 days 🔍
06/09/2016 +1 days 🔍
08/23/2022 +2266 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: symantec.com

Advisory: symantec.com
Researcher: Markus Wulftange
Organization: Code White
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2015-8800 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2015-8800
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-87773
SecurityFocus: 90886 - Multiple Symantec Products CVE-2015-8800 Arbitrary Command Injection Vulnerability

See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 06/09/2016 11:44
Updated: 08/23/2022 09:20
Changes: 06/09/2016 11:44 (68), 01/08/2019 11:13 (6), 08/23/2022 09:20 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Want to know what is going to be exploited?

We predict KEV entries!