Unix/Linux RPC alis Service information disclosure

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
3.3$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in Unix and Linux. Affected is an unknown function of the component RPC alis Service. Performing a manipulation results in information disclosure. No exploit exists. It is suggested to update the configuration settings.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Unix and Linux (Operating System) (the affected version is unknown). It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown code of the component RPC alis Service. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a information disclosure vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-200. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality.

The weakness was disclosed 01/01/1999. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592 for this issue.

The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 10210 (RPC alis Service Detection), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family RPC and running in the context r.

It is possible to mitigate the problem by applying the configuration setting .

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (270), Tenable (10210) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-1039†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Type

Name

License

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.3

VulDB Base Score: 3.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Information disclosure
CWE: CWE-200 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Nessus ID: 10210
Nessus Name: RPC alis Service Detection
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Context: 🔍

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Config
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

01/01/1999 🔍
01/01/1999 +0 days 🔍
08/19/1999 +230 days 🔍
02/24/2003 +1285 days 🔍
06/28/2016 +4873 days 🔍
02/11/2019 +958 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Status: Not defined

GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-88197
X-Force: 270
Vulnerability Center: 1039 - alis RPC Service is Running, Info

Entryinfo

Created: 06/28/2016 13:21
Updated: 02/11/2019 14:22
Changes: 06/28/2016 13:21 (35), 02/11/2019 14:22 (13)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Do you need the next level of professionalism?

Upgrade your account now!