VDB-88794 · XFDB 6307 · SBV-2782

Enterasys RoamAbout Access Point WEP missing encryption

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
5.8$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in Enterasys RoamAbout Access Point. It has been declared as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the component WEP. The manipulation results in missing encryption. The attack must be initiated from a local position. There is no exploit available. Modifying the configuration settings is advised.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Enterasys RoamAbout Access Point (version now known). Affected is some unknown processing of the component WEP. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a missing encryption vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-311. The product does not encrypt sensitive or critical information before storage or transmission. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

The weakness was shared 01/01/1999. Local access is required to approach this attack. The exploitation doesn't require any form of authentication. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not available. This vulnerability is assigned to T1600 by the MITRE ATT&CK project.

It is possible to mitigate the problem by applying the configuration setting . It is possible to mitigate the problem by adding WEP as an encryption mechanism. The best possible mitigation is suggested to be the change of configuration settings.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (6307) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-2782†). The entries VDB-88793, VDB-88792 and VDB-88791 are related to this item. If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.9
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.8

VulDB Base Score: 5.9
VulDB Temp Score: 5.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Missing encryption
CWE: CWE-311 / CWE-310
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Config
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Encryption: WEP

Timelineinfo

01/01/1999 🔍
01/01/1999 +0 days 🔍
11/10/2003 +1774 days 🔍
07/07/2016 +4623 days 🔍
06/07/2017 +335 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Status: Not defined

GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-88794
X-Force: 6307
Vulnerability Center: 2782 - WEP is Disabled for the Wireless Network, High

See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 07/07/2016 17:00
Updated: 06/07/2017 14:40
Changes: 07/07/2016 17:00 (37), 06/07/2017 14:40 (7)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Might our Artificial Intelligence support you?

Check our Alexa App!