INetCash Finance Service /isec/index.php lang cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in INetCash Finance Service and classified as problematic. This affects an unknown function of the file /isec/index.php. The manipulation of the argument lang results in cross site scripting. The attack can be launched remotely. Moreover, an exploit is present.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in INetCash Finance Service (Financial Software) (the affected version is unknown). Affected is an unknown code of the file /isec/index.php. The manipulation of the argument lang with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-80. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as "<", ">", and "&" that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages. This is going to have an impact on integrity.
The weakness was disclosed 07/28/2011 as VL-ID 112 as not defined advisory (Website). The advisory is available at vulnerability-lab.com. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Successful exploitation requires user interaction by the victim. Technical details and a public exploit are known. This vulnerability is assigned to T1059.007 by the MITRE ATT&CK project.
After immediately, there has been an exploit disclosed. The exploit is shared for download at vulnerability-lab.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. By approaching the search of inurl:isec/index.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The entries VDB-91241 and VDB-91243 are pretty similar. If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-80 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
Google Hack: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exploit Delay Time: 🔍
Timeline
07/28/2011 🔍07/28/2011 🔍
09/06/2016 🔍
04/10/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: VL-ID 112Status: Not defined
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-91242
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 09/06/2016 14:28Updated: 04/10/2019 16:32
Changes: 09/06/2016 14:28 (42), 04/10/2019 16:32 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.