Asus RT-N10/RT-N10E/RT-N10LX/RT-N10U 1.9.2.7 /apply.cgi current_page Reflected cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in Asus RT-N10, RT-N10E, RT-N10LX and RT-N10U 1.9.2.7. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /apply.cgi. Performing a manipulation of the argument current_page with the input %22%3E%3Cbody%20onload=alert%28document.cookie%29%3E results in cross site scripting (Reflected).
Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. Furthermore, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Asus RT-N10, RT-N10E, RT-N10LX and RT-N10U 1.9.2.7. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown code of the file /apply.cgi. The manipulation of the argument current_page with the input value %22%3E%3Cbody%20onload=alert%28document.cookie%29%3E leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability (Reflected). CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-80. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as "<", ">", and "&" that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages. This is going to have an impact on integrity.
The weakness was published 09/14/2016 by MustLive as not defined mailinglist post (Full-Disclosure). The advisory is shared at seclists.org. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details and a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
A public exploit has been developed by MustLive and been published immediately after the advisory. The exploit is shared for download at seclists.org. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The advisory illustrates:
I found this and other routers in 2014-2015 to take control over terrorists in Crimea, Donetsk and Lugansks regions of Ukraine.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Similar entries are available at VDB-91724 and VDB-91726. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.asus.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: ReflectedClass: Cross site scripting / Reflected
CWE: CWE-80 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Author: MustLive
Download: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exploit Delay Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/14/2016 🔍09/14/2016 🔍
09/21/2016 🔍
09/21/2016 🔍
Sources
Vendor: asus.comAdvisory: seclists.org
Researcher: MustLive
Status: Not defined
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-91725
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 09/21/2016 11:36Updated: 09/21/2016 11:41
Changes: 09/21/2016 11:36 (48), 09/21/2016 11:41 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.