SonicWALL Viewpoint 6.0 SP2 Description Reflected cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in SonicWALL Viewpoint 6.0 SP2. It has been rated as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the component Description Handler. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting (Reflected). Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. Applying a patch is the recommended action to fix this issue.
Details
A vulnerability was found in SonicWALL Viewpoint 6.0 SP2 (Firewall Software) and classified as problematic. This issue affects an unknown function of the component Description Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability (Reflected). Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-80. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as "<", ">", and "&" that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages. Impacted is integrity.
The weakness was published 09/27/2011 by Benjamin Kunz Mejri as VL-ID 195 as not defined advisory (Website). The advisory is shared at vulnerability-lab.com. The attack may be initiated remotely. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 134 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
Applying the patch 104767 is able to eliminate this problem. A possible mitigation has been published 4 days after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
Similar entries are available at VDB-91793, VDB-91794, VDB-91795 and VDB-91796. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.sonicwall.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: ReflectedClass: Cross site scripting / Reflected
CWE: CWE-80 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: PatchStatus: 🔍
Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍
Patch: 104767
Timeline
05/16/2011 🔍06/21/2011 🔍
09/27/2011 🔍
10/01/2011 🔍
09/21/2016 🔍
04/22/2019 🔍
Sources
Vendor: sonicwall.comAdvisory: VL-ID 195
Researcher: Benjamin Kunz Mejri
Status: Not defined
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-91805
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 09/21/2016 22:11Updated: 04/22/2019 16:51
Changes: 09/21/2016 22:11 (48), 04/22/2019 16:51 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.