LANDesk Management Suite up to 10.0.0.271 Packet collector.exe memory corruption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in LANDesk Management Suite up to 10.0.0.271. The affected element is an unknown function of the file collector.exe of the component Packet Handler. This manipulation causes memory corruption. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2016-3147. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in LANDesk Management Suite up to 10.0.0.271 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code of the file collector.exe of the component Packet Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Buffer overflow in the collector.exe listener of the Landesk Management Suite 10.0.0.271 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a large packet.
The bug was discovered 06/30/2016. The weakness was disclosed 01/23/2017 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2016-3147 since 03/14/2016. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 207 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 93565†). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.5
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/14/2016 🔍06/30/2016 🔍
10/14/2016 🔍
01/23/2017 🔍
01/23/2017 🔍
01/24/2017 🔍
05/14/2026 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2016-3147 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2016-3147
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-95827
SecurityFocus: 93565 - Landesk Management Suite CVE-2016-3147 Local Stack Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
OSVDB: - CVE-2016-3147 - Landesk - Management Suite - Buffer Overflow Issue
Entry
Created: 01/24/2017 08:30Updated: 05/14/2026 13:59
Changes: 01/24/2017 08:30 (58), 07/30/2020 15:00 (5), 05/14/2026 13:59 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.