| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Cisco Hybrid Meeting Server 1.0. Affected is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2016-9218. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Cisco Hybrid Meeting Server 1.0. This affects an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
A vulnerability in Cisco Hybrid Meeting Server could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack against the user of the web interface. More Information: CSCvc28662. Known Affected Releases: 1.0.
The bug was discovered 01/18/2017. The weakness was published 01/26/2017 with Cisco as CSCvc28662 as not defined security advisory (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2016-9218 since 11/06/2016. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 05/14/2026).
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 8 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $5k-$25k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 95634†). Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.cisco.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
11/06/2016 🔍01/18/2017 🔍
01/18/2017 🔍
01/26/2017 🔍
01/26/2017 🔍
01/26/2017 🔍
05/14/2026 🔍
Sources
Vendor: cisco.comAdvisory: CSCvc28662⛔
Organization: Cisco
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2016-9218 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2016-9218
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-95985
SecurityFocus: 95634 - Cisco Hybrid Meeting Server CVE-2016-9218 Cross Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
OSVDB: - CVE-2016-9218 - Cisco - Hybrid Meeting Server - Cross-Site Request Forgery Issue
Entry
Created: 01/26/2017 14:57Updated: 05/14/2026 21:10
Changes: 01/26/2017 14:57 (58), 08/02/2020 08:47 (7), 05/14/2026 21:10 (18)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.

No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.