| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Ubiquiti TS-16-CARRIER, TS-5-POE, TS-8-PRO, PicoStation2 and PicoStation2HP. Affected is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross site scripting (Reflected). Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Ubiquiti TS-16-CARRIER, TS-5-POE, TS-8-PRO, PicoStation2 and PicoStation2HP. It has been classified as problematic. This affects some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability (Reflected). CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-80. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as "<", ">", and "&" that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages. This is going to have an impact on integrity.
The weakness was published 01/30/2017 by T. Weber with SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab as SEC Consult SA-20170130-0 :: XSS & CSRF in multiple Ubiquiti Networks products as not defined mailinglist post (Full-Disclosure). It is possible to read the advisory at seclists.org. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 69 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Similar entry is available at VDB-96316. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: ReflectedClass: Cross site scripting / Reflected
CWE: CWE-80 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
11/22/2016 🔍11/22/2016 🔍
01/30/2017 🔍
01/31/2017 🔍
08/08/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: SEC Consult SA-20170130-0 :: XSS & CSRF in multiple Ubiquiti Networks productsResearcher: T. Weber
Organization: SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab
Status: Not defined
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-96315
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 01/31/2017 15:54Updated: 08/08/2020 11:00
Changes: 01/31/2017 15:54 (42), 08/08/2020 11:00 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.