Cisco Aironet 3600 Wireless LAN Controller FlexConnect/Standalone Mode memory corruption

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in Cisco Aironet 3600 Wireless LAN Controller. Impacted is an unknown function of the component FlexConnect/Standalone Mode. This manipulation causes memory corruption. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2013-3441. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Cisco Aironet 3600 Wireless LAN Controller (Wireless LAN Software) (the affected version is unknown). Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code of the component FlexConnect/Standalone Mode. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:
Cisco Aironet 3600 access points allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and device crash) by disrupting Cisco Wireless LAN Controller communication and consequently forcing many transitions from FlexConnect mode to Standalone mode, aka Bug ID CSCuh71210.
The weakness was published 07/22/2013 as CSCuh71210 as confirmed advisory (Website). The advisory is shared at tools.cisco.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2013-3441 since 05/06/2013. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 61404†), OSVDB (95548†) and Secunia (SA54284†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.cisco.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.9
VulDB Base Score: 5.9
VulDB Temp Score: 5.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/06/2013 🔍07/22/2013 🔍
07/22/2013 🔍
07/23/2013 🔍
07/23/2013 🔍
07/23/2013 🔍
05/20/2021 🔍
Sources
Vendor: cisco.comAdvisory: CSCuh71210
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2013-3441 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2013-3441
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-9685
SecurityFocus: 61404
Secunia: 54284 - Cisco Aironet 3600 Series Access Point Denial of Service Vulnerability, Less Critical
OSVDB: 95548
SecurityTracker: 1028818
Entry
Created: 07/23/2013 11:37Updated: 05/20/2021 14:38
Changes: 07/23/2013 11:37 (48), 05/07/2018 09:13 (8), 05/20/2021 14:37 (3), 05/20/2021 14:38 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Committer:
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.