| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability labeled as critical has been found in Moxa OnCell. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation results in access control. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2016-8363. The attack can be executed remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Moxa OnCell (Automation Software) (the affected version unknown). Affected is an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a access control vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-264. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. CVE summarizes:
An issue was discovered in Moxa OnCell OnCellG3470A-LTE, AWK-1131A/3131A/4131A Series, AWK-3191 Series, AWK-5232/6232 Series, AWK-1121/1127 Series, WAC-1001 V2 Series, WAC-2004 Series, AWK-3121-M12-RTG Series, AWK-3131-M12-RCC Series, AWK-5232-M12-RCC Series, TAP-6226 Series, AWK-3121/4121 Series, AWK-3131/4131 Series, and AWK-5222/6222 Series. User is able to execute arbitrary OS commands on the server.
The bug was discovered 11/03/2016. The weakness was released 02/13/2017 by Maxim Rupp (Website). The advisory is shared for download at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2016-8363 since 09/28/2016. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploitation doesn't require any form of authentication. There are neither technical details nor an exploit publicly available. The MITRE ATT&CK project declares the attack technique as T1068.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 102 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 94092†). Entry connected to this vulnerability is available at VDB-96875. Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.moxa.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.6
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 10.0
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Access controlCWE: CWE-264
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/28/2016 🔍11/03/2016 🔍
11/03/2016 🔍
02/13/2017 🔍
02/13/2017 🔍
02/14/2017 🔍
09/02/2020 🔍
Sources
Vendor: moxa.comAdvisory: securityfocus.com⛔
Researcher: Maxim Rupp
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2016-8363 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2016-8363
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-96876
SecurityFocus: 94092 - Moxa OnCell Series Products Authentication Bypass and OS Command Execution Vulnerabilities
OSVDB: - CVE-2016-8363 - Moxa - Multiple Products - Command Execution Issue
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 02/14/2017 09:09Updated: 09/02/2020 07:19
Changes: 02/14/2017 09:09 (57), 09/02/2020 07:19 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.