| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Kabona AB WebDatorCentral up to 3.3.x. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown function of the file redirect/non-validated. Performing a manipulation results in redirect. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2016-8376. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Kabona AB WebDatorCentral up to 3.3.x. This affects an unknown code block of the file redirect/non-validated. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a redirect vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-601. A web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a Redirect. This simplifies phishing attacks. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
An issue was discovered in Kabona AB WebDatorCentral (WDC) application prior to Version 3.4.0. This non-validated redirect/non-validated forward (OPEN REDIRECT) allows chaining with authenticated vulnerabilities.
The bug was discovered 10/13/2016. The weakness was published 02/13/2017 by Martin (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2016-8376 since 09/28/2016. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1204.001 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 123 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
Upgrading to version 3.4.0 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 93547†). Similar entries are available at VDB-96862 and VDB-96869. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: RedirectCWE: CWE-601
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: WebDatorCentral 3.4.0
Timeline
09/28/2016 🔍10/13/2016 🔍
10/13/2016 🔍
02/13/2017 🔍
02/13/2017 🔍
02/14/2017 🔍
08/14/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Researcher: Martin
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2016-8376 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2016-8376
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-96885
SecurityFocus: 93547 - Kabona AB WDC ICSA-16-287-07 Multiple Security Vulnerabilities
OSVDB: - CVE-2016-8376 - Kabona AB - WDC - Open Redirect Issue
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 02/14/2017 09:11Updated: 08/14/2020 12:09
Changes: 02/14/2017 09:11 (62), 08/14/2020 12:09 (5)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.