Mozilla Firefox up to 51.x on Windows Mozilla Windows Updater/Maintenance Service File access control

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
4.8$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability has been found in Mozilla Firefox up to 51.x on Windows and classified as problematic. This affects an unknown function of the component Mozilla Windows Updater/Maintenance Service. This manipulation causes access control (File). This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2017-5409. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. The affected component should be upgraded.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Mozilla Firefox up to 51.x on Windows (Web Browser). It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part of the component Mozilla Windows Updater/Maintenance Service. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a access control vulnerability (File). The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-264. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:

The Mozilla Windows updater can be called by a non-privileged user to delete an arbitrary local file by passing a special path to the callback parameter through the Mozilla Maintenance Service, which has privileged access. Note: This attack requires local system access and only affects Windows. Other operating systems are not affected. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 45.8 and Firefox < 52.

The bug was discovered 03/07/2017. The weakness was published 03/07/2017 by Holger Fuhrmannek as MFSA 2017-05 as confirmed security advisory (Website). The advisory is shared at mozilla.org. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-5409 since 01/13/2017. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.

The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 97639 (Mozilla Firefox < 52.0 Multiple Vulnerabilities), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Windows and running in the context l. The commercial vulnerability scanner Qualys is able to test this issue with plugin 370325 (Mozilla Firefox Multiple Vulnerabilities (MFSA2017-05,MFSA2017-06)).

Upgrading to version 52 eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published immediately after the disclosure of the vulnerability.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (97639), SecurityFocus (BID 96696†) and SecurityTracker (ID 1037966†). Similar entries are available at VDB-97756, VDB-97757, VDB-97758 and VDB-97759. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Type

Vendor

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.9
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.8

VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 5.5
NVD Vector: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Name: File
Class: Access control / File
CWE: CWE-264
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Nessus ID: 97639
Nessus Name: Mozilla Firefox < 52.0 Multiple Vulnerabilities
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Context: 🔍

OpenVAS ID: 803347
OpenVAS Name: Mozilla Firefox ESR Security Updates(mfsa_2017-05_2017-07)-Windows
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍

Qualys ID: 🔍
Qualys Name: 🔍

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍

Upgrade: Firefox 52

Timelineinfo

01/13/2017 🔍
03/07/2017 +53 days 🔍
03/07/2017 +0 days 🔍
03/07/2017 +0 days 🔍
03/07/2017 +0 days 🔍
03/08/2017 +1 days 🔍
03/09/2017 +1 days 🔍
03/10/2017 +1 days 🔍
06/11/2018 +457 days 🔍
11/26/2025 +2725 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: mozilla.org
Product: mozilla.org

Advisory: MFSA 2017-05
Researcher: Holger Fuhrmannek
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2017-5409 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-5409
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-97765

OVAL: 🔍

SecurityFocus: 96696 - Mozilla Firefox CVE-2017-5409 Arbitrary File Deletion Vulnerability
OSVDB: - CVE-2017-5409 - Mozilla - Firefox - File Modification Issue
SecurityTracker: 1037966

See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 03/10/2017 08:14
Updated: 11/26/2025 02:54
Changes: 03/10/2017 08:14 (88), 08/18/2020 12:52 (1), 11/26/2025 02:54 (19)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Might our Artificial Intelligence support you?

Check our Alexa App!