USBPcap 1.1.0.0 IOCTL Call IofCallDriver null pointer dereference
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.7 | $0-$5k | 0.09 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in USBPcap 1.1.0.0. Affected is the function IofCallDriver of the component IOCTL Call Handler. This manipulation causes null pointer dereference.
This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2017-6178. The attack is restricted to local execution. Moreover, an exploit is present.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in USBPcap 1.1.0.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function IofCallDriver of the component IOCTL Call Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a null pointer dereference vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-476. A NULL pointer dereference occurs when the application dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid, but is NULL, typically causing a crash or exit. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:
The IofCallDriver function in USBPcap 1.1.0.0 allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted 0x00090028 IOCTL call, which triggers a NULL pointer dereference.
The bug was discovered 03/09/2017. The weakness was disclosed 03/20/2017 as EDB-ID 41542 as not defined exploit (Exploit-DB). The advisory is shared at exploit-db.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-6178 since 02/21/2017. The exploitation appears to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details and also a public exploit are known.
A public exploit has been developed in ANSI C. It is possible to download the exploit at securityfocus.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 11 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Exploit-DB (41542) and SecurityFocus (BID 97026†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Base Score: 4.0
VulDB Temp Score: 3.7
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Null pointer dereferenceCWE: CWE-476 / CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Programming Language: 🔍
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
02/21/2017 🔍03/09/2017 🔍
03/20/2017 🔍
03/20/2017 🔍
03/20/2017 🔍
03/21/2017 🔍
07/02/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: EDB-ID 41542Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-6178 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-6178
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-98317
SecurityFocus: 97026 - USBPcap CVE-2017-6178 Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
OSVDB: - CVE-2017-6178 - USBPcap - Privilege Escalation Issue
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 03/21/2017 07:26Updated: 07/02/2024 20:03
Changes: 03/21/2017 07:26 (63), 09/10/2020 12:40 (7), 07/02/2024 20:03 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:126:103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.